STATE v. ROTHERMEL, 96-1828-CR (Wis.Ct.App. 11-27-1996)

STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STEVEN R. ROTHERMEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Case No. 96-1828-CR.
Opinion Released: November 27, 1996 Opinion Filed: November 27, 1996 This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waushara County: LEWIS MURACH, Judge. Affirmed.

VERGERONT, J.[1]

[1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to §752.31(2), Stats.

Steven R. Rothermel appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. The sole issue on appeal is whether his prosecution was precluded by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution because his license had been administratively suspended for the same violation.

Rothermel acknowledges that in State v. McMaster, 198 Wis.2d 542, 543 N.W.2d 499 (Ct.App. 1995), petition for review granted, ___ Wis.2d ___, 546 N.W.2d 468 (1996), we held that criminal prosecution for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration after administrative suspension of operating privileges does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Id. at 544, 543 N.W.2d at 499. Rothermel explains that he has raised this issue on appeal solely to preserve it for review.

McMaster is controlling. We conclude that the prosecution did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST TEMPLIN, 886 N.W.2d 79 (2016)

886 N.W.2d 79 (2016) 2016 WI 83 In the Matter of DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Thor…

9 years ago

EASTERLING v. LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION, No. 2016AP190 (Wis. App. 2/2/2017)

     Recommended for publication in the official reports. STATE OF WISCONSIN IN THE COURT OF…

9 years ago

VOSBURG v. PUTNEY, 80 Wis. 523 (1891)

80 Wis. 523, *; 50 N.W. 403, ** VOSBURG, by guardian ad litem, Respondent, v.…

9 years ago

STATE v. NOWAK, 2011 WI App 99

334 Wis.2d 809, 800 N.W.2d 957 State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jenny L. Nowak, Defendant-Appellant.…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAASE, 2006 WI 126

297 Wis.2d 320 State v. Haase. No. 2005AP987-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 21, 2006. [EDITOR'S…

9 years ago

STATE v. SKIBBA, 2001 WI App 224

247 Wis.2d 990, 635 N.W.2d 26 State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anthony F. Skibba, Sr.,…

9 years ago