Articles Tagged: 2011 WI 100

Cottonwood Fin. LTD v. Estes. No. 2009AP0760.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 25, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

State v. Napier. No. 2010AP1656.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

Sager v. Bd. Of Review of Town of Taycheedah. No. 2009AP0972.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

Burt v. Staeheli. No. 2010AP2618.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 9

State v. Grayer. No. 2010AP1749-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

State v. Marker. No. 2010AP1896-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

Sheboygan Cnty. Dept. of Health and Human Serv. v. Wesley M. No. 2010AP2946.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 9

State v. Welch. No. 2009AP2045.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

Dane Cnty. Dept. of Human Serv. v. Jennifer F. No. 2011AP0529.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Carpenter. No. 2009AP2496-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

Wis. Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Arby Constr. No. 2010AP0878.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITIONS FOR REVIEW GRANTED. Page 1

DeCoster v. Bastian. No. 2010AP1305.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Garcia. No. 2010AP1682-CRNM.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 9, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. Page 5

Rivera v. Huibregste. No. 2008AP1081-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

State v. David W. Free. No. 2010AP2441-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

State v. Fitzpatrick. No. 2010AP0662-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

State v. Bahr. No. 2009AP2581.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

State v. Larry D. Conley. No. 2011AP0846.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 6, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. Page 11

Brenner v. City of New Richmond. No. 2010AP0342.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 28, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITIONS FOR REVIEW GRANTED. Page 11

Ralph Gentile, Inc. v. Div. of Hearings and Appeals. No. 2010A2524.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. Page 12

State v. Freland. No. 2010AP0496.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

State v. Henry W. No. 2011AP0693.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Zielinski. No. 2009AP2263-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

Dixon v. Hnilicka Comp., Inc. No. 2009AP1953.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

State v. Miller. No. 2010AP0044-CRNM.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

State v. Malsbury. No. 2010AP3112-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Bradley, J., dissents. Crooks, J., did not participate. Page 9

Kenosha Cnty. Dept. of Human Serv. v. Amber D. No. 2011AP0667.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Tran. No. 2008AP0340.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 1

State v. Love. No. 2010AP0853.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 5

Brown v. Koenig. No. 2010AP2688.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 9

Johnson v. Racine Cnty. Circuit Court. No. 2011AP0704-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 11

Rubedor v. Kopp. No. 2009AP3133.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

State v. Peralta. No. 2010AP0563.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 5

The Lamar Co., LLC v. Country Side Rest., Inc. No. 2010AP2023.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 25, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITIONS FOR REVIEW GRANTED. Page 2

City of Sheboygan v. Walli. No. 2010AP1257.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Mitchell. No. 2010AP2116-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

State v. Baldwin. No. 2009AP1542-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

Kenosha Cnty. Dept. of Human Serv. v. Amber D. No. 2011AP0562.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Hooker. No. 2010AP1814-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

Hussein v. Vill. Of Germantown Bd. of Zoning Appeals. No. 2010AP2178.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

state v. Negrete. No. 2010AP1702.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITIONS FOR REVIEW GRANTED. Page 2

State v. Jackson. No. 2010AP0678.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 5

State v. Winston. No. 2009AP0887.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

Mellom v. Schindler Elevator Corp. No. 2009AP0304.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Prosser, J., dissents. Page 2

Thomas v. Circuit Court for Juneau Cnty. No. 2011AP1988-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 28, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. Page 9

State v. Osinski. No. 2009AP2879-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

Best Price Plumbing Inc. v. Erie Ins. Exch. No. 2010AP1474.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 25, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITIONS FOR REVIEW GRANTED. Page 1

Dane Cnty. Dept. of Human Serv. v. Minerva L. No. 2011AP1168.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Hicks. No. 2010AP1316-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Louis. No. 2009AP2502-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

Koll v. DOJ. No. 2008AP2027.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 14, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. Abrahamson, C.J. concurring. Prosser, J., dissenting. Page 11

State v. Day. No. 2010AP1331-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

Pierson v. Smith. No. 2010AP1529.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

Baker v. Smith. No. 2010AP1789-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

State v. Hoffman. No. 2010AP2036-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

State v. Johnson. No. 2010AP0530.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

State v. Morton. No. 2011AP0471-CRNM.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Baldwin. No. 2009AP1541-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

Martine v. Williams. No. 2010AP1426.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Passineau. No. 2010AP1729-CRNM.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

Doxtator v. Schwochert. No. 2010AP0242-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

State v. Lawver. No. 2010AP0382-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

State v. Kelly. No. 2010AP1741-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

Dane Cnty. Dept. of Human Serv. v. Porfirio O. No. 2011AP1246.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Rowan. No. 2010AP1398-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION BY COURT OF APPEAL TO CERTIFY. Granted. Page 1

State v. Pritle. No. 2010AP1363-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Bahr. No. 2009AP2582.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

State v. Morton. No. 2011AP0434-CRNM.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 9

State v. Keith. No. 2010AP1667-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 25, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

State v. Patterson. No. 2009AP3080-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 3

State v. Lawrence Calvin Robinson, III. No. 2010AP2518-CRNM.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

State v. Below. No. 2010AP0798-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 5

State v. Johnson. No. 2010AP0987.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Godard. No. 2010AP1731-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 7

State v. Baldwin. No. 2009AP1540-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

Dane Cnty. Dept. of Human Serv. v. Jennifer F. No. 2011AP0530.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Virsnieks. No. 2010AP1967.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

Mt. Morris Mut. Ins. Co. v. Awe. No. 2010AP2957.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 9

Nielsen v. Jackelen. No. 2010AP1852.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

State v. Stowe. No. 2010AP2458-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 8

Cnty. of Sheboygan v. Taylor. No. 2010AP2819.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 9

Stone Farms, Inc. v. Am. Transmission Co. No. 2010AP1427.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

Cnty. of Sheboygan v. Taylor. No. 2010AP2818.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 9

Brooks v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc. No. 2010AP0613.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

Wis. Hous. Econ. Dev. Auth. v. Tri-Corp. Hous., Inc. No. 2010AP0418.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

State v. Burns. No. 2010AP1220-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 12, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Bradley, J., dissents. Page 8

Mund v. Liu. No. 2011AP0801-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Jones. No. 2010AP0282-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

Jendusa v. Larsen. No. 2009AP0392.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

State v. Evans. No. 2010AP1294-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Rodgers. No. 2010AP0672-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 5

Mund v. Liu. No. 2011AP0801-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10

State v. Jones. No. 2010AP0282-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. October 24, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 4

Jendusa v. Larsen. No. 2009AP0392.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

State v. Evans. No. 2010AP1294-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 6

State v. Rodgers. No. 2010AP0672-CR.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 5

Vang v. Pollard. No. 2009AP0674-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 2

Zavala McDaniel v. Aldrich. No. 2010AP1021.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 5

Estate of Brianna Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc. No. 2009AP1212.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 27, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITIONS FOR REVIEW GRANTED. Page 1

Phiffer v. Jenkins. No. 2011AP0554-W.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. September 1, 2011. [EDITORS’ NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23 (2) AND (3).] PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. Page 10