546 N.W.2d 142

RUSSELL M. WARE, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. ADRIAN P. SCHOONE, RICHARD A. FORTUNE AND MARK J. LEUCK, Defendants-Respondents-Respondents, SCHOONE, FORTUNE LEUCK, S.C., Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
No. 93-2873Oral argument February 27, 1996
Decided March 29, 1996

(Affirming 191 Wis.2d 359 (table), 530 N.W.2d 69 (Ct.App. 1995).)

REVIEW of a decision of the court of appeals. Affirmed.

For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs b L. William Staudenmaier, Alexander T. Pendleton an Cook Franke, S.C., Milwaukee and oral argument b L. William Staudenmaier.

Page 713

For the defendants-respondents there was a brief by Thomas M. Devine, David A. Wolfe and Hostak, Henzl Bichler, S.C., Racine and oral argument by Thomas M. Devine.

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Chief Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice JON P. WILCOX, and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice JANINE P. GESKE being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Page 714

Tagged: